How would partial privatization impact healthcare accessibility?

Adam, a financially stable 50-year-old man, has recently been diagnosed with bilateral cataracts. An ophthalmologist confirmed the diagnosis and recommended surgery for both eyes. The surgeon, however, offered Adam two options: either wait his turn in the government hospital or pay for the procedure with bifocal lenses in a private facility. Adam chose to pay, his decision was driven by a deep understanding of the value of his health. It became evident to him that there was no amount of money that could replace his vision, and that the longer he waited, the more his health would deteriorate. As a result, he decided to place his health above his wealth. Many Canadians have experienced long waiting lists for treatment, delays in appointments, and limited access to specialized care. Consequently, many Canadians have turned to other countries for medical care at a high cost. Read: Dr. Jabir Jassam: Adding more doctors does not solve the problem, it creates one We must ask ourselves, what if Canadians were able to receive the care they need without having to travel abroad to obtain it? The issue of privatizing the healthcare system has been controversial in Canada, with concerns regarding the possibility of a two-tiered healthcare system and the accessibility of healthcare to all Canadians. There are many who think that partial privatization could help resolve the healthcare access issues that Canadians face. Partially privatizing the healthcare system would not necessarily imply abandoning the principles of the Canada Health Act, which ensures that Canadians have access to healthcare regardless of their financial situation. Rather, it will provide additional options for those who are willing and able to pay for them. This could also alleviate the burden on public healthcare systems, allowing more resources to be allocated to those who are unable to afford private healthcare. In addition, having two tiers may contribute to the reduction of medical tourism, where Canadians travel abroad to receive medical treatment. The availability of private healthcare options in Canada would allow Canadians to receive the treatment they need, stimulate the Canadian economy, and reduce the outflow of money overseas. There is an argument that privatizing healthcare would result in increased inequality, since only those with the means to pay for private healthcare would be able to access the best treatment. However, this is not always the case. It is possible to establish regulations that will ensure that all Canadians have access to the same quality of healthcare as provided by private healthcare providers. As well, of course, private healthcare providers will be required to pay taxes, contributing to the Canadian economy. We have learned from the COVID-19 pandemic that healthcare needs to be prioritized. A pandemic has highlighted the challenges that Canadians face when seeking healthcare and the need for a more flexible and efficient healthcare system. As Adam's story illustrates, our health is of utmost importance and must be prioritized above all else. We can achieve a healthcare system that benefits all Canadians by exploring the potential benefits of privatizing the healthcare system and creating a system that provides both public and private healthcare options. We must have an open and honest discussion about how to improve healthcare in Canada instead of simply replacing the burnt light with another from a nearby room. Dr. Jabir Jassam is a family physician in Ottawa.

How would partial privatization impact healthcare accessibility?

Register for free access or login.

Related Topics