CMAJ disgraces itself by publishing Islamophobic drivel

You know, I really wonder if physicians organizations that claim to “support their members” really understand what that phrase means. Time and time again we’ve seen physicians' representative groups fail their members. Now we have the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) allow an attack on Muslim members to be published. I’m talking about the CMAJ decision to publish a letter by Dr. Sherif Emil that states categorically that the hijab—a voluntary head covering worn by some Muslim women—is an instrument of oppression: Read: Dr. Sohail Gandhi: Tone deaf CFPC fails its members, embarrasses itself Seriously, the journal of the Canadian Medical Association, an organization that proudly claims to want to promote diversity and inclusion, that boldly states “diversity is our strength” and has developed background papers in diversity to promote its agenda, thought it was a good idea to publish a letter that: claims the hijab is an instrument of oppression conflates the hijab with institutionalized child rape claims that a hijab wearing women wouldn’t be allowed to ride a bike The whole letter is simply a series of Islamophobic tropes that one would expect to find in alt-right white supremacist type websites. The fact that it was the editor of CMAJ who wrote the headline, only adds to the pain and hurt caused by this whole episode, despite the fact she has since apologized. I’m forced to wonder, what would have happened if I commented on, say, orthodox Jewish women, many of who choose to wear wigs to cover their hair? I obviously don’t know the exact religious reasons why but a friend of mine pointed out this link on chabad.org that goes into it in more detail. Now supposing I had written a letter saying that an orthodox Jewish woman making herself “unavailable by covering her hair” was akin to misogyny/oppression/child abuse, etc. Had I said that, I frankly would expect everyone to call me an anti-Semite. And had I written that to a medical journal, I would never expect such a letter to see print. And that’s the real problem. It shows a double standard that exists within the CMAJ. I would never be able to get a letter full of negative connotations about Jewish/Indigenous/Black/LGBTQS2+/insert minority of choice published in the CMAJ. They would rightfully feel that publishing that would harm a segment of their members and would not be productive to building an inclusive organization. But a letter (and headline) that blatantly expresses anti-Muslim rhetoric? Apparently that’s OK. To be clear, this is not really an argument about free speech either. Dr. Emil has a right to his views as distasteful as I find them. He’s free to spout this nonsense whenever he wants and I’m free to think less of him every time he does. Those are our rights as protected by the Canadian Charter. But, when the journal of a representative organization allows publication of a letter that attacks a segment of their membership, the type of letter that they never would allow if it targeted another segment, well, we have a problem. Many Muslims have been left reeling these past few years by a series of events. An eleven-year-old girl attacked for wearing a hijab. A pregnant Muslim woman attacked by teens who tried to rip off her hijab. A spate of attacks against hijab wearing Muslim women in Edmonton. The tragic killing of a Muslim family in London in a truck attack where the perpetrator was able to identify the family as Muslim (likely because the women were wearing hijabs). There are many more but you get the point. Hijab-wearing Muslim women are being attacked repeatedly. As an aside this only increases the tremendous respect I have for those who choose to wear a hijab. To have such strength of faith that you would still wear a hijab, knowing that you might be targeted for an attack, shows courage, resilience and a resolve I find inspiring. Now, a mere 11 days after a school teacher is removed from her class for wearing a hijab, we have the CMAJ, a journal of an organization that allegedly represents close to 80,000 doctors, refer to that same hijab as “an instrument of oppression.” Seriously, has not anyone at CMAJ ever heard of the phrase “victim-blaming?” I was going to tell you what I thought, but Danyal Ladha, a PGY-3 in internal medicine, said it much better than I could on twitter: The only way this article could have passed through your editorial process without red flags is if the culture of Islamophobia is so prevalent that nobody batted a second eye. Extremely insulting to all of the Muslim physicians including myself who have published with you. — Danyal Ladha (@danyalladha) December 22, 2021 Having caused such harm, the ball frankly is in CMAJ’s and the CMA’s court. Will they retract the article, issue a full and complete apology, and reach out to groups like the Muslim Medical Association of Canada to learn and educate themselves about how their actions have caused real pain to their members? Or does the vaunted push for diversity and inclusion the CMA is promoting not apply when it comes to Muslims? Time will tell. Dr. Sohail Gandhi is a former president of the OMA and opinions are his and not necessarily the opinions of the OMA Board. This article is a reprint from his blog site: justanoldcountrydoctor.com.

CMAJ disgraces itself by publishing Islamophobic drivel

Register for free access or login.

Related Topics